The concept of health, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), encompasses a holistic approach, considering not only physical well-being but also mental and social aspects. In 1946, during the WHO International Health Conference in New York, this definition was established: “Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”
While this definition has remained unchanged for decades, it has not been without critique. Machteld Huber and colleagues have raised concerns about its applicability in today’s context, particularly with the prevalence of chronic diseases. They argue that the term ‘complete well-being’ is overly ambitious and impractical, potentially leaving most individuals in a perpetual state of ‘unhealthiness.’ Furthermore, they suggest that such a broad definition may inadvertently support the medical technology and pharmaceutical industries, which thrive on treating ailments rather than promoting holistic well-being.
Despite these criticisms, the WHO’s definition endures due to its breadth and ambition. It serves as a guiding principle for global health initiatives, emphasizing the interconnectedness of physical, mental, and social factors in determining overall wellness.
The term ‘disease’ traces its origins to Old French, where ‘desaise’ meant ‘lack of ease.’ This etymology underscores the discomfort and disruption that diseases bring to individuals and communities. In its modern definition, disease is understood as a disorder of structure or function in humans, animals, or plants, leading to specific symptoms or affecting particular locations. Importantly, it is distinguished from physical injury, representing a broader spectrum of health challenges that require attention and intervention.
When delving into the realm of individual health and disease, it becomes imperative to move beyond broad strokes and employ more specific terminology. We often encounter various terms such as injuries, disabilities, disorders, syndromes, infections, isolated symptoms, deviant behaviors, and atypical variations of structure and function when discussing diseases.
In human context, “disease” typically refers to any condition that inflicts pain, dysfunction, distress, social complications, or even death upon the afflicted individual, or those closely associated with them. However, it’s essential to note that the terms disease, disorder, morbidity, and illness are often used interchangeably, despite each having its nuanced definition.
Effective categorisation serves as a prerequisite for determining appropriate treatment pathways. Understanding whether a disease is infectious or non-infectious, clinically evident or latent, symptomatic or asymptomatic during its incubation period, is crucial for devising suitable interventions. When referring to illnesses or sicknesses, we may include conditions such as lethargy, depression, anorexia, sleepiness, hyperalgesia, and inability to concentrate.
The term disorder, employed in various medical contexts, primarily identifies physical abnormalities not caused by infectious agents, such as metabolic disorders. Disorders encompass a broad spectrum of functional abnormalities or disturbances, spanning mental, physical, genetic, emotional, behavioral, and functional categories.
Morbidity, derived from the Latin “morbidus” meaning “sick” or “unhealthy,” denotes a state of disease, disability, or poor health resulting from various causes. It acknowledges the existence of any form of disease and highlights the degree to which a health condition affects the patient.
Additionally, the term syndrome is frequently used to describe a cluster of medical signs, symptoms, or other characteristics that often manifest together. Syndromes, such as Down syndrome and Parkinson syndrome, represent complex conditions with multifaceted presentations, requiring comprehensive understanding and management.
In various medical sciences, the understanding of disease often diverges, reflecting different philosophical and theoretical frameworks. Let’s explore how disease is conceptualized in two distinct medical systems:
Homeopathy:
Within the realm of homeopathy, the concept of health extends beyond mere absence of symptoms, encapsulating a state where the vital force orchestrates the harmonious functioning and sensations of the organism. This vital force, a dynamic energy inherent in all living beings, serves as the guiding principle behind homeopathic philosophy. Disease, on the other hand, is perceived as a disturbance in this vital force, triggered by various influences known as morbific agents.
In essence, disease in homeopathy is not merely a collection of symptoms but rather a manifestation of the disrupted vital force, leading to an array of abnormal sensations and functions throughout the body. These disturbances, whether subtle or pronounced, are outward expressions of the underlying imbalance within the vital force. Homeopathy, with its holistic approach, seeks to address this imbalance by stimulating the body’s innate healing response and restoring equilibrium to the vital force.
Ayurveda:
In Ayurveda, a traditional system of medicine originating from ancient India, health is described as a state of balance among various elements within the body. According to Ayurvedic principles, optimal health, or “svastha,” is achieved when there is harmony among three doshas (bioenergies), namely Vata, Pitta, and Kapha, along with a balanced metabolic process (agni) and proper excretions. Additionally, when the soul (atman), senses (indriyas), intellect (manah), and internal peace (prasannatma) are in alignment, it signifies the attainment of optimal health. Ayurveda emphasizes the interconnectedness of physical, mental, and spiritual aspects in maintaining overall well-being.
These perspectives underscore the diversity of approaches to understanding health and disease across different medical sciences, each offering unique insights into the nature of illness and the pathways to wellness.
In the realm of Chinese Traditional Medicine (TCM) and Acupuncture, health is not merely the absence of disease but is regarded as integral to leading a fulfilling life. It is seen as part of a broader pursuit of a good life, characterised by harmonious interactions with the community and the physical and spiritual environment.
At the core of TCM philosophy lies the concept of Qi, often translated as “vital energy” or “life force.” Qi is considered the fundamental substance that distinguishes living beings from inanimate objects. It is believed to permeate all aspects of existence, encompassing both the physical and metaphysical realms.
In TCM, disease is perceived as a disharmony or imbalance in the interactions of various elements within the body, including yin and yang (complementary forces), Qi, blood (xuĕ), organ systems (zàng-fǔ), and meridians (energy pathways). This disharmony can also extend to the relationship between the human body and its external environment.
Therapeutic interventions in TCM are aimed at identifying and addressing these patterns of disharmony. Practitioners analyse the individual’s symptoms and constitution to determine the underlying imbalance and formulate a treatment plan accordingly. Common patterns of disharmony may involve excesses or deficiencies of Qi or other vital substances, as well as invasions by external factors such as wind, cold, or dampness.
Acupuncture, a key modality within TCM, seeks to restore balance and promote healing by stimulating specific points along the body’s meridian pathways. By regulating the flow of Qi and rebalancing the body’s energy, acupuncture aims to address the root causes of disease and facilitate the body’s innate healing mechanisms.
Overall, TCM and Acupuncture offer a holistic approach to health and disease, emphasising the interconnectedness of mind, body, and environment. By restoring harmony within the body and harmonising with the external world, these ancient healing traditions strive to promote not only physical well-being but also emotional, mental, and spiritual wellness.
Homotoxicology, a field derived from the combination of “homo” meaning man, “toxico” signifying toxin or poison, and “logy” rooted in the Greek ‘logos’, meaning study, delves into the intricate relationship between toxic substances and their impact on human health.
In essence, Homotoxicology views diseases as manifestations of the body’s intricate defense mechanisms against both internal and external toxins, or as efforts to counteract the toxic damage inflicted upon it. This perspective underscores the body’s inherent resilience and adaptive responses to environmental challenges.
One of the notable features of Homotoxicology is its classification of diseases into six distinct levels based on the severity of the patient’s condition. These levels include the Excretion phase, Inflammation phase, Deposition phase, Impregnation phase, Degeneration, and Differentiation. Each phase represents a stage in the body’s response to toxic insults, ranging from initial detoxification efforts to the onset of tissue damage and cellular dysfunction.
Moreover, Homotoxicological disease evaluation tables further delineate these phases, offering insights into the nature and progression of the disease process. The table is structured to distinguish between diseases caused by external toxins (extracellular) and those stemming from internal sources (intracellular), providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the underlying mechanisms of toxicity.
In essence, the biological division outlined in Homotoxicology serves as a crucial demarcation point, highlighting the transition from extracellular to intracellular intoxication. This distinction is pivotal from an organic standpoint, often signifying a critical juncture in the progression of disease beyond which the body’s natural defenses may be significantly compromised.
Electrohomeopathy offers a refreshingly straightforward perspective on health and disease, emphasizing clarity and completeness in its definitions. According to this system, life resides within the blood and lymph, while disease manifests as their vitiation. Diseases are neatly categorized into two groups: positive and negative, with activity levels above neutral considered positive and those below normal classified as negative. For instance, hyperthyroidism is regarded as a positive disease, whereas hypothyroidism falls under the negative category.
What sets Electrohomeopathy apart is its remarkably simple dosology. Positive diseases require negative doses, while negative diseases benefit from positive doses. The potency scale follows a clear hierarchy: D4 represents a positive or strong dose, D5 is neutral, and anything beyond D5, like D6, constitutes a negative dose. Dilution is straightforward, achieved by adding nine parts water to one part of the original dilution, typically through ten downward strokes.
One of Electrohomeopathy’s distinguishing features is its deliberate avoidance of potentially toxic substances found in conventional medicines. By exclusively utilizing plant-based ingredients and adhering to the spagyric method of preparation, Electrohomeopathic remedies remain free from impurities and adverse effects. This approach effectively eliminates concerns about drug-induced diseases or intoxication, providing patients with a safer alternative.
In summary, Electrohomeopathy’s precise classification of health and disease offers a unique perspective among various medical systems. Its simplicity and clarity not only streamline treatment protocols but also enhance patient safety and efficacy, positioning Electrohomeopathy as a compelling option in the landscape of modern healthcare.
Maq Masi Blog 
Leave a comment