
Why are we so often trapped? And by whom? The answer is not only in the deceiver’s hand, but in our own. We are trapped because of blind trust, unchecked attachment, and the comforting story we tell ourselves about those we love or admire. We are trapped by the sibling we assume will be fair, the friend whose urgent plea bypasses our reason, the partner whose promise seems to echo our goodwill. What ensnares us is not only their request, but our willingness to believe without question.
History and daily life alike are filled with examples of how trust, when unchecked, becomes a weapon. There are marriages entered into not for love but for gain, where affection is staged only to secure wealth, status, or advantage. There are relationships built on false declarations, where someone claims freedom while concealing obligations elsewhere, leaving another to discover betrayal only when it is too late. In each case the trap is not simply in the deceiver’s act, but in the unquestioned faith that allowed it to unfold.
These stories, whether in courts, homes, or whispered confidences, remind us that trust given without examination can become the very ground on which deception thrives. Helping is noble, but when we help out of emotion, hoping for gratitude or return, we step into the first circle of betrayal. The act itself is within our control; the outcome never is. If we give as pure charity, with no expectation, there is no risk of disappointment. But if we give under the spell of a false promise, the trap is already sprung.
Part of avoiding the trap is learning to say no. Many of us fail at this not because we cannot see the risk, but because we care too much about how refusal reflects on us. We fear being judged unkind, or worse, we fear puncturing our own ego, which secretly delights in being the rescuer. Saying no requires humility: accepting that we are not saviours, and that real care sometimes lies in holding back rather than giving in.
So how do we avoid falling? By testing before committing. If a friend asks for money, give a little less than they want and see what follows. Do they honour the small amount, repay it, show gratitude? Or do they vanish even from that? The small test exposes character more clearly than grand declarations ever will.
This is not coldness; it is discipline. Kant reminds us that we must not allow ourselves to be used merely as means. The Stoics teach us to act only where we have control. Nietzsche adds another warning: help, when given from weakness or pity, can be turned back against us. It can create dependence, or even resentment, and become the very weapon used to wound the giver. True help, he believed, must flow from strength — an overflow of vitality that empowers the other, not a sacrifice that drains the self. And ancient strategists like Chanakya insisted that integrity must be proven under pressure before trust is granted. The principle is universal: measure the person before you measure the size of your help.
The art of not falling lies in these habits: never confuse love with obligation; never grant trust without proof; never risk more than you can afford to lose; and perhaps most of all, never be afraid to say no. If you give, let it be clean and unconditional. If you lend, write it down and test in small steps. If you doubt, wait and watch.
We are trapped less by others than by our own hope. And when we learn to discipline expectation, betrayal loses its sting. Trust then becomes not a weakness, but a strength guided by clear eyes.
No price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
— Friedrich Nietzsche
Leave a comment